recent videos

‘Serosorting’ is not a reliable prevention method. Reason being, just because two HIV negative people have sex with one another or unprotected sex doesn't mean their safe from not catching HIV. One party might have had unprotected sex with an HIV positive person and didn’t know. Read more

I truly believe that ‘serosorting’ is not a reliable prevention method, been there done that! I was careless and didn't feel I needed to be responsible for myself and the other individual. The comfort made it easy for me but as time went on infections kept occurring; he was on medications and I wasn’t. Read more

If there was a way to prove 100 percent that the potential partner is definitely negative then this would be a good idea, except for the fact that there are other STDs that can be contracted by unprotected sex. However, I don't know how I would feel if someone I liked would not give me the time of day just because I was positive.

Love peace and happiness

"There is no reality in the absence of observation." -- The Copenhagen Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics Read more

For me personally I don’t believe that serosorting is a reliable method for preventing HIV. After all, people lie on a regular basis about their HIV status, that is if they even know their status. It is very easy to give misleading information over the Internet. Read more